Let Ω\Omega be a nonempty compact set of a locally convex space LL, and let C(Ω)C(\Omega) be the Banach space of all real-valued continuous functions on Ω\Omega endowed with the sup⁡\sup-norm. In this paper, we show first that for every f∈C(Ω)f\in C(\Omega), and for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, there are continuous affine functions (gi)i=1m,(hj)j=1n(g_i)_{i=1}^m, (h_j)_{j=1}^n on LL for some m,n∈Nm,n\in\mathbb{N} such that ∣f(ω)−[(g1∨g2∨⋯∨gm)−(h1∨h2∨⋯∨hn)](ω)∣<ε|f(\omega)-[(g_1\vee g_2\vee\cdots\vee{g_m})-(h_1\vee h_2\vee \cdots\vee{h_n})](\omega)|<\varepsilon uniformly for ω∈Ω\omega\in\Omega. We prove then that if Ω=BX∗\Omega=B_{X^*}, the closed unit ball of X∗X^* of a Banach space XX endowed with the w∗w^*-topology, then C(Ω)∗C(\Omega)^* is just the dual of the normed semigroup b(X)(X) generated closed balls in XX

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Lixin Cheng

School of Mathematical Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China

lxcheng@xmu.edu.cn

Yu Zhou

School of Fundamental Studies, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China

roczhou_fly@126.com
  1. M. Bačák, J. M. Borwein: On difference convexity of locally Lipschitz functions, Optimization 60 (2011) 961–978.https://doi.org/10.1080/02331931003770411Google Scholar
  2. M. C. Boiso: Approximation of Lipschitz functions by ∆-convex functions in Banach spaces, Israel J. Math. 106 (1998) 269–284.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02773472Google Scholar
  3. M. C. Boiso: Two characterizations of super-reflexive Banach spaces by the behavior of differences of convex functions, J. Funct. Anal. 191 (2002) 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1006/jfan.2001.3854Google Scholar
  4. L. Cheng, Q. Cheng, B. Wang, W. Zhang: On super weakly compact sets and uniformly convexifiable sets, Stud. Math. 199(2) (2010) 145–169.https://doi.org/10.4064/sm199-2-2Google Scholar
  5. L. Cheng, Z. Luo, Y. Zhou: On super weakly compact convex sets and representation of the dual of the normed semigroup they generate, Can. Math. Bull. 56 (2013) 272–282.https://doi.org/10.4153/CMB-2011-169-3Google Scholar
  6. L. Cheng, Y. Zhou: On approximation by ∆- convex polyhedron support functions and the dual of cc(X) and wcc(X), J. Convex Analysis 19(1) (2012) 201–212.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca19012Google Scholar
  7. P. Hartman: On functions representable as a difference of convex functions, Pacific J. Math. 9 (1959) 707–713.https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1959.9.707Google Scholar
  8. E. Hewitt, K. Stromberg: Real and Abstract Analysis. A Modern Treatment of the Theory of Functions of a Real Variable, Springer, New York (1965).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-88047-6Google Scholar
  9. K. Keimel, W. Roth: Ordered Cones and Approximation, Springer, Berlin (1992).https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0089190Google Scholar
  10. A. A. Pavlov: Normed semigroups and their applications in noncommutative differential geometry, J. Math. Sci., New York 113(5) (2003) 675–682.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021110613081Google Scholar
  11. H. Rådstrøm: An embedding theorem for spaces of convex sets, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1952) 165–169.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1952-0045938-2Google Scholar
  12. L. Veselý, L. Zajíček: On compositions of d.c. functions and mappings, J. Convex Analysis 16(2) (2009) 423–439.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca16023Google Scholar
  13. C. Wu, L. Cheng: Extensions of the Preiss differentiability theorem, J. Funct. Anal. 124 (1994) 112–118.https://doi.org/10.1006/jfan.1994.1100Google Scholar

L. Cheng, Y. Zhou. “Approximation by DC Functions and Application to Representation of a Normed Semigroup.” Journal of Convex Analysis 21 (2014), No. 3, 651–661. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca21034