Let mm be a vector measure taking values in a Banach space XX. We prove that if the integration operator Im:L1(m)→XI_m: L^1(m) \to X, Im(f)=∫f dmI_m(f)=\int f \, dm, is completely continuous and XX is Asplund, then mm has finite variation and L1(m)=L1(∣m∣)L^1(m) =L^1(|m|).

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

José M. Calabuig

Instituto Universitario de Matemática Pura y Aplicada, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain

jmcalabu@mat.upv.es

José Rodríguez

Departamento de Matemática Aplicada, Facultad de Informática, Universidad de Murcia, 30100 Espinardo (Murcia), Spain

joserr@um.es

Enrique A. Sánchez-Pérez

Instituto Universitario de Matemática Pura y Aplicada, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain

easancpe@mat.upv.es
  1. J. M. Calabuig, J. Rodríguez, E. A. Sánchez-Pérez: On the structure of L1 of a vector measure via its integration operator, Integral Equations Oper. Theory 64(1) (2009) 21–33.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00020-009-1670-5Google Scholar
  2. C. Castaing, M. Valadier: Convex Analysis and Measurable Multifunctions, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 580, Springer, Berlin (1977).https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0087685Google Scholar
  3. G. P. Curbera: Operators into L1 of a vector measure and applications to Banach lattices, Math. Ann. 293(2) (1992) 317–330.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01444717Google Scholar
  4. G. P. Curbera: When L1 of a vector measure is an AL-space, Pacific J. Math. 162(2) (1994) 287–303.https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1994.162.287Google Scholar
  5. J. Diestel, J. J. Uhl, Jr.: Vector Measures, Mathematical Surveys 15, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1977).https://doi.org/10.1090/surv/015Google Scholar
  6. M. Fabian, P. Habala, P. Hájek, V. Montesinos, V. Zizler: Banach Space Theory, CMS Books in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin (2011).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7515-7Google Scholar
  7. H. Fetter, B. Gamboa de Buen: The James Forest, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 236, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997).Google Scholar
  8. N. Ghoussoub, E. Saab: On the weak Radon-Nikodým property, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 81(1) (1981) 81–84.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1981-0589141-4Google Scholar
  9. S. Okada, W. J. Ricker, L. Rodríguez-Piazza: Compactness of the integration operator associated with a vector measure, Stud. Math. 150(2) (2002) 133–149.https://doi.org/10.4064/sm150-2-3Google Scholar
  10. S. Okada, W. J. Ricker, L. Rodríguez-Piazza: Operator ideal properties of vector measures with finite variation, Stud. Math. 205(3) (2011) 215–249.https://doi.org/10.4064/sm205-3-2Google Scholar
  11. S. Okada, W. J. Ricker, L. Rodríguez-Piazza: Operator ideal properties of the integration map of a vector measure, Indag. Math., New Ser., to appear, doi:10.1016/j.indag.2012.11.008.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indag.2012.11.008Google Scholar
  12. S. Okada, W. J. Ricker, E. A. Sánchez Pérez: Optimal Domain and Integral Extension of Operators, Acting in Function Spaces, Operator Theory: Advances and Applications 180, Birkhäuser, Basel (2008).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8648-1Google Scholar
  13. I. Singer: Bases in Banach Spaces. I, Springer, New York (1970).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51633-7Google Scholar
  14. M. Zippin: Banach spaces with separable duals, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 310(1) (1988) 371–379.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1988-0965758-0Google Scholar

J. M. Calabuig, J. Rodríguez, E. A. Sánchez-Pérez. “On Completely Continuous Integration Operators of a Vector Measure.” Journal of Convex Analysis 21 (2014), No. 3, 811–818. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca21043