We obtain an analogue of the classical "Four-Cones Coincidence Theorem" in Carnot groups, i.e we characterize intrinsic sub-manifolds by the coincidence of its lower and upper paratangent (and tangent, as well) cones

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Francesco Bigolin

Dipartimento di Matematica di Trento, via Sommarive 14, 38100 Povo (Trento), Italy

bigolin@science.unitn.it
  1. J. P. Aubin, H. Frankowska: Set-Valued Analysis, Birkhäuser, Boston (1990).Google Scholar
  2. F. Bigolin, S. Nicolussi Golo: A historical account on characterizations of C 1 manifolds in Euclidean spaces by tangent cones, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 412(1) (2014) 63–76.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.10.035Google Scholar
  3. F. Bigolin, G. H. Greco: Geometric characterizations of C 1 manifolds in Euclidean spaces by tangent cones, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 396(1) (2012) 145–163.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.06.010Google Scholar
  4. G. Bouligand: Introduction à la Géométrie Infinitésimale Directe, Vuibert, Paris (1932).Google Scholar
  5. F. H. Clarke: Generalized gradients and applications, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 205 (1975) 247–262.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1975-0367131-6Google Scholar
  6. B. Cornet: Contributions à la Théorie Mathématique des Mécanismes Dynamiques d’Allocation des Ressources Thèse, Université de Paris IX, Paris (1981).Google Scholar
  7. S. Dolecki, G. H. Greco: Towards historical roots of necessary conditions of optimality: regula of Peano, Control Cybern. 36 (2007) 491–518.Google Scholar
  8. S. Dolecki, G. H. Greco: Tangengy vis-à-vis differentiability by Peano, Severi and Guareschi, J. Convex Analysis 18(2) (2011) 301–339.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca18017Google Scholar
  9. G. B. Folland, E. M. Stein: Hardy Spaces on Homogeneous Groups, Mathematical Notes 28, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1982).https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691222455Google Scholar
  10. B. Franchi, R. Serapioni, F. Serra Cassano: Regular hypersurfaces, intrinsic perimeter and implicit function theorem in Carnot groups, Commun. Anal. Geom. 11(5) (2003) 909–944.https://doi.org/10.4310/CAG.2003.v11.n5.a4Google Scholar
  11. N. G. Lloyd: Degree Theory, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 73, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1978).Google Scholar
  12. G. Peano: Applicazioni Geometriche del Calcolo Infinitesimale, Bocca, Torino (1887).https://doi.org/10.3792/chmm/1424377228Google Scholar
  13. F. Severi: Sulla differenziabilitá totale delle funzioni di piú variabili, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., IV. Ser. 13 (1934) 1–35.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02413430Google Scholar
  14. S. K. Vodopyanov: Differentiability of mappings in the geometry of Carnot manifolds, Sib. Math. J. 48(2) (2007) 197–213.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11202-007-0022-4Google Scholar
  15. S. K. Vodop’yanov, I. M. Pupyshev: Whitney-type theorems on the extension of functions on Carnot groups, Sib. Mat. Zh. 47(4) (2006) 731–752.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11202-006-0072-zGoogle Scholar

F. Bigolin, A. Kozhevnikov. “Tangency, Paratangency and Four-Cones Coincidence Theorem in Carnot Groups.” Journal of Convex Analysis 21 (2014), No. 3, 887–899. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca21048