We study the pointwise supremum of convex integral functionals If,γ(ξ)=sup⁡Q(∫Ωf(ω,ξ(ω))Q(dω)−γ(Q))\mathcal{I}_{f,\gamma}(\xi)= \sup_{Q} \left( \int_\Omega f(\omega,\xi(\omega))Q(d\omega)-\gamma(Q)\right) on L∞(Ω,F,P)L^\infty(\Omega,\mathcal{F},\mathbb{P}) where f:Ω×R→R‾f:\Omega \times\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\overline{\mathbb{R}} is a proper normal convex integrand, γ\gamma is a proper convex function on the set of probability measures absolutely continuous w.r.t. P\mathbb{P}, and the supremum is taken over all such measures. We give a pair of upper and lower bounds for the conjugate of If,γ\mathcal{I}_{f,\gamma} as direct sums of a common regular part and respective singular parts; they coincide when dom(γ)={P}\mathrm{dom}(\gamma)=\{\mathbb{P}\} as Rockafellar's classical result, while both inequalities can generally be strict. We then investigate when the conjugate eliminates the singular measures, which a fortiori yields the equality in bounds, and its relation to other finer regularity properties of the original functional and of the conjugate.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Keita Owari

Graduate School of Economics, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-0033 Tokyo, Japan

owari@e.u-tokyo.ac.jp
  1. C. D. Aliprantis, K. C. Border: Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide, 3rd Ed., Springer, Berlin (2006).Google Scholar
  2. F. Bellini, M. Frittelli: On the existence of minimax martingale measures, Math. Finance 12 (2002) 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9965.00001Google Scholar
  3. S. Biagini, M. Frittelli, M. Grasselli: Indifference price with general semimartingales, Math. Finance 21 (2011) 423–446.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9965.2010.00443.xGoogle Scholar
  4. C. Castaing, M. Valadier: Convex Analysis and Measurable Multifunctions, Lecture Notes in Math. 580, Springer, Berlin (1977).https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0087685Google Scholar
  5. F. Delbaen: Differentiability properties of utility functions, in: Optimality and Risk – Modern Trends in Mathematical Finance, F. Delbaen et al. (ed.), Springer, Berlin (2009) 39–48.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02608-9_3Google Scholar
  6. C. Dellacherie, P.-A. Meyer: Probabilities and Potential, North-Holland Mathematics Studies 29, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1978).Google Scholar
  7. N. Dunford, J. T. Schwartz: Linear Operators. Part I: General Theory, Wiley Classics Library, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1988).Google Scholar
  8. I. Ekeland, R. Temam: Convex Analysis and Variational Problems, Studies in Mathematics and its Applications 1, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1976).Google Scholar
  9. H. Föllmer, A. Gundel: Robust projections in the class of martingale measures, Ill. J. Math. 50 (2006) 439–472.https://doi.org/10.1215/ijm/1258059482Google Scholar
  10. H. Föllmer, A. Schied, S. Weber: Robust preferences and robust portfolio choice, in: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Methods in Finance, A. Bensoussan, Q. Zhang, P. G. Ciarlet (eds.), Handbook of Numerical Analysis 15, North-Holland, Amsterdam (2009) 29–88.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-8659(08)00002-1Google Scholar
  11. A. Grothendieck: Topological Vector Spaces, Notes on Mathematics and its Applications Gordon and Breach, New York (1973).Google Scholar
  12. E. Hewitt, K. Stromberg: Real and Abstract Analysis: A Modern Treatment of the Theory of Functions of a Real Variable, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 25, Springer, New York (1975).Google Scholar
  13. E. Jouini, W. Schachermayer, N. Touzi: Law invariant risk measures have the Fatou property, in: Advances in Mathematical Economics 9, S. Kusuoka et al. (ed.), Springer, Tokyo (2006) 49–71.https://doi.org/10.1007/4-431-34342-3_4Google Scholar
  14. A. Kozek: Convex integral functionals on Orlicz spaces, Commentat. Math. 21 (1980) 109–135.Google Scholar
  15. J.-J. Moreau: Sur la fonction polaire d’une fonction semi-continue supérieurement, C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris 258 (1964) 1128–1130.Google Scholar
  16. J. Orihuela, M. Ruiz Galán: A coercive James’s weak compactness theorem and nonlinear variational problems, Nonlinear Anal. 75 (2012) 598–611.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2011.08.062Google Scholar
  17. J. Orihuela, M. Ruiz Galán: Lebesgue property for convex risk measures on Orlicz spaces, Math. Financ. Econ. 6 (2012) 15–35.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-012-0058-5Google Scholar
  18. K. Owari: On admissible strategies in robust utility maximization, Math. Financ. Econ. 6 (2012) 77–92.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-012-0068-3Google Scholar
  19. K. Owari: Maximum Lebesgue extension of monotone convex functions, J. Funct. Anal. 266 (2014) 3572–3611.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2014.01.002Google Scholar
  20. K. Owari: On the Lebesgue property of monotone convex functions, Math. Financ. Econ. 8 (2014) 159–167.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-013-0111-zGoogle Scholar
  21. R. T. Rockafellar: Extension of Fenchel’s duality theorem for convex functions, Duke Math. J. 33 (1966) 81–89.https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-66-03312-6Google Scholar
  22. R. T. Rockafellar: Integrals which are convex functionals. II, Pacific J. Math. 39 (1971) 439–469.https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1971.39.439Google Scholar
  23. R. T. Rockafellar: Integral functionals, normal integrands and measurable selections, in: Nonlinear Operators and the Calculus of Variations (Brussels, 1975), J. P. Gossez et al. (ed.), Lecture Notes in Math. 543, Springer, Berlin (1976) 157–207.https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0079944Google Scholar
  24. R. T. Rockafellar, R. J.-B. Wets: Variational Analysis, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 317, Springer, Berlin (1998).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02431-3Google Scholar
  25. W. Schachermayer: A super-martingale property of the optimal portfolio process, Finance Stoch. 7 (2003) 433–456.https://doi.org/10.1007/s007800200096Google Scholar
  26. A. Schied: Optimal investments for risk- and ambiguity-averse preferences: a duality approach, Finance Stoch. 11 (2007) 107–129.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-006-0024-2Google Scholar
  27. W. Wittmüss: Robust optimization of consumption with random endowment, Stochastics 80 (2008) 459–475.https://doi.org/10.1080/17442500701761347Google Scholar
  28. C. Zălinescu: Convex Analysis in General Vector Spaces, World Scientific, River Edge (2002).https://doi.org/10.1142/5021Google Scholar

K. Owari. “A Robust Version of Convex Integral Functionals.” Journal of Convex Analysis 22 (2015), No. 3, 827–852. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca22042