A direction dd is called a tangent direction to the unit sphere SS if the conditions s∈Ss\in S and aff⁡(s+d)\operatorname{aff}(s+d) is a tangent line to the sphere SS at ss imply that aff⁡(s+d)\operatorname{aff}(s+d) is a one-sided tangent to the sphere SS, i.e., it is the limit of secant lines at the point ss. A set MM is called convex with respect to a direction dd if [x,y]⊂M[x,y]\subset M whenever x,y∈Mx,y\in M, (y−x)∥d(y-x)\parallel d. It is shown that in an arbitrary normed space an arbitrary sun (in particular, a boundedly compact Chebyshev set) is convex with respect to any tangent direction of the unit sphere.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Alexey R. Alimov

Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics, Moscow State University
and: Steklov Math. Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

alexey.alimov-msu@yandex.ru

Evgeny V. Shchepin

Steklov Math. Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

scepin@mi.ras.ru
  1. A. R. Alimov: Convexity of bounded Chebyshev sets in finite-dimensional asymmetrically normed spaces, Izv. Saratov. Univ. (N.S.) Ser. Mat. Mekh. Inform. 14(4-2) (2014) 489–497.https://doi.org/10.18500/1816-9791-2014-14-4-489-497Google Scholar
  2. A. R. Alimov: Continuity of the metric projection and local solar properties of sets, Set-Valued Var. Analysis 27(1) (2019) 213–222.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11228-017-0449-0Google Scholar
  3. A. R. Alimov: On approximative properties of locally Chebyshev sets, Proc. Inst. Math. Mech., Natl. Acad. Sci. Azerb. 44(1) (2018) 36–42.Google Scholar
  4. A. R. Alimov: Locally Chebyhsev sets in the space ℓ∞ n, Vestn. Dushanbe Branch of the Lomonosov Moscow State Univer. 2018(4) (2018) 5–8.Google Scholar
  5. A. R. Alimov, E. V. Shchepin: Convexity of Chebyshev sets with respect to tangent directions, Russian Math. Surveys 73(2) (2018) 366–368.https://doi.org/10.1070/RM9813Google Scholar
  6. A. R. Alimov, I. G. Tsar’kov: Connectedness and solarity in problems of best and near-best approximation, Russian Math. Surveys 71(1) (2016) 1–77.https://doi.org/10.1070/RM9698Google Scholar
  7. M. V. Balashov, G. E. Ivanov: Weakly convex and proximally smooth sets in Banach spaces, Izv. Math. 73(3) (2009) 455–499.https://doi.org/10.1070/IM2009v073n03ABEH002454Google Scholar
  8. F. Bernard, L. Thibault, N. Zlateva: Characterizations of prox-regular sets in uniformly convex Banach spaces, J. Convex Analysis 13(3-4) (2006) 525–559.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca13044Google Scholar
  9. A. A. Flerov: Locally Chebyshev sets on the plane, Math. Notes 97(1) (2015) 136–142.https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001434615010150Google Scholar
  10. A. A. Flerov: Sets with at most two-valued metric projection on a normed plane, Math. Notes 101(2) (2017) 352–364.https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001434617010382Google Scholar
  11. G. E. Ivanov: Weak convexity of sets and functions in a Banach space, J. Convex Analysis 22(2) (2015) 365–398.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca22017Google Scholar
  12. I. G. Tsar’kov: Singular sets of surfaces, Russ. J. Math. Phys. 24 (2017) 263–271.https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061920817020121Google Scholar
  13. L. P. Vlasov: Approximative properties of sets in normed linear spaces, Russian Math. Surveys 28(6) (1973) 1–66.https://doi.org/10.1070/RM1973v028n06ABEH001624Google Scholar

A. R. Alimov, E. V. Shchepin. “Convexity of Suns in Tangent Directions.” Journal of Convex Analysis 26 (2019), No. 4, 1071–1076. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca26058