We prove that the complement of a closed set S satisfying an extended exterior sphere condition is nothing but the union of closed balls with common radius. This generalizes Theorem 3 of F. Nacry and L. Thibault [Distance function associated to a prox-regular set, Set-Valued Var. Analysis 30 (2022) 731–750] where the set S is assumed to be prox-regular, a property stronger than the extended exterior sphere condition. We also provide a sufficient condition for the equivalence between prox-regularity and the extended exterior sphere condition that generalizes previous work of C. Nour, R. J. Stern and J. Takche [Proximal smoothness and the exterior sphere condition, J. Convex Analysis 16/2 (2009) 501–514] to the case in which S is not necessarily regular closed.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Chadi Nour

Dept. of Computer Science and Mathematics, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon

cnour@lau.edu.lb

Jean Takche

Dept. of Computer Science and Mathematics, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon

jtakchi@lau.edu.lb
  1. A. Canino, On p-convex sets and geodesics, J. Diff. Equations 75/1 (1988) 118–157.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(88)90132-5Google Scholar
  2. P. Cannarsa, H. Frankowska: Interior sphere property of attainable sets and time optimal control problems, ESAIM: Control Optim. Calc. Var. 12 (2006) 350–370.https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv:2006002Google Scholar
  3. P. Cannarsa, C. Sinestrari: Convexity properties of the minimum time function, Calc. Var. 3 (1995) 273–298.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01189393Google Scholar
  4. P. Cannarsa, C. Sinestrari: Semiconcave Functions, Hamiton-Jacobi Equations and Optimal Control, Birkhäuser, Boston (2004).https://doi.org/10.1007/b138356Google Scholar
  5. F. H. Clarke: Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis, John Wiley, New York (1983).Google Scholar
  6. F. H. Clarke, Yu. Ledyaev, R. J. Stern, P. R. Wolenski: Nonsmooth Analysis and Control Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 178, Springer, New York (1998).Google Scholar
  7. F. H. Clarke, R. J. Stern, P. R. Wolenski: Proximal smoothness and the lower-C 2 property, J. Convex Analysis 2/1-2 (1995) 117–144.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca02008Google Scholar
  8. G. Colombo, A. Marigonda: Differentiability properties for a class of non-convex functions, Calc. Var. 25 (2005) 1–31.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-005-0352-7Google Scholar
  9. H. Federer: Curvature measures, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 93 (1959) 418–491.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1959-0110078-1Google Scholar
  10. B. S. Mordukhovich: Variational Analysis and Generalized Differentiation. I: Basic Theory, Springer, Berlin (2006).https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31247-1Google Scholar
  11. F. Nacry, L. Thibault: Distance function associated to a prox-regular set, Set-Valued Var. Analysis 30 (2022) 731–750.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11228-021-00616-xGoogle Scholar
  12. C. Nour, R. J. Stern: Semiconcavity of the bilateral minimal time function: the linear case, Systems & Control Letters 57 (2008) 863–866.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2008.04.001Google Scholar
  13. C. Nour, R. J. Stern, J. Takche: Proximal smoothness and the exterior sphere condition, J. Convex Analysis 16/2 (2009) 501–514.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca16027Google Scholar
  14. C. Nour, R. J. Stern, J. Takche: The union of uniform closed balls conjecture, Control and Cybernetics 38/4B (2009) 1525–1534.Google Scholar
  15. C. Nour, R. J. Stern, J. Takche: The θ-exterior sphere condition, φ-convexity and local semiconcavity, Nonlinear Analysis 73/2 (2010) 573–589.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2010.04.001Google Scholar
  16. C. Nour, R. J. Stern, J. Takche: Validity of the union of uniform closed balls conjecture, J. Convex Analysis 18/2 (2011) 589–600.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca18037Google Scholar
  17. C. Nour, R. J. Stern, J. Takche: Generalized exterior sphere conditions and φ-convexity, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Systems 29/2 (2011) 615–622.https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2011.29.615Google Scholar
  18. C. Nour, J. Takche: On the union of closed balls property, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 155 (2012) 376–389.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-012-0068-8Google Scholar
  19. J.-P. Penot: Calculus Without Derivatives, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 266, Springer, New York (2013).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4538-8Google Scholar
  20. R. A. Poliquin, R. T. Rockafellar, L. Thibault: Local differentiability of distance functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 352 (2000) 5231–5249.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-00-02550-2Google Scholar
  21. R. T. Rockafellar: Clarke’s tangent cones and the boundaries of closed sets in Rn, Nonlinear Analysis Theory Math. Appl. 3 (1979) 145–154.https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-546X(79)90044-0Google Scholar
  22. R. T. Rockafellar, R. J.-B. Wets: Variational Analysis, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 317, Springer, Berlin (1998).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02431-3Google Scholar
  23. A. S. Shapiro: Existence and differentiability of metric projections in Hilbert spaces, SIAM J. Optim. 4 (1994) 231–259.https://doi.org/10.1137/0804006Google Scholar

C. Nour, J. Takche. “The Extended Exterior Sphere Condition.” Journal of Convex Analysis 31 (2024), No. 1, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca31003