In a pseudo-Euclidean space with scalar product S(⋅,⋅)S(\cdot, \cdot), we show that the singularities of projections on SS-monotone sets and of the associated Fitzpatrick functions are covered by countable c−cc-c surfaces having positive normal vectors with respect to the SS-product. By L. Zajíček [On the differentiation of convex functions in finite and infinite dimensional spaces, Czechoslovak Math. J. 29/104 (1979) 340–348], the singularities of a convex function ff can be covered by a countable collection of c−cc-c surfaces. We show that the normal vectors to these surfaces are restricted to the cone generated by F−FF-F, where F:=cl range ∇fF:= {\rm cl}\,{\rm range}\,\nabla f, the closure of the range of the gradient of ff.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Dmitry Kramkov

Department of Mathematical Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, U.S.A.
and: University of Oxford

kramkov@cmu.edu
  1. P. Albano, P. Cannarsa: Structural properties of singularities of semiconcave functions, Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) 28/4 (1999) 719–740.Google Scholar
  2. G. Alberti: On the structure of singular sets of convex functions, Calc. Var. Partial Diff. Equations 2 (1994) 17–27.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01234313Google Scholar
  3. L. Ambrosio, N. Gigli: A user’s guide to optimal transport, in: Modelling and Optimisation of Flows on Networks, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 2062, Springer, Berlin (2013) 1–155.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32160-3_1Google Scholar
  4. E. Asplund: Čebyšev sets in Hilbert space, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (1969) 235–240.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1969-0253023-7Google Scholar
  5. Y. Benyamini, J. Lindenstrauss: Geometric Nonlinear Functional Analysis. Vol. 1, AMS Colloquium Publications Volume 48, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2000).https://doi.org/10.1090/coll/048Google Scholar
  6. Y. Brenier: Polar factorization and monotone rearrangement of vector-valued functions, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 44 (1991) 375–417.https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160440402Google Scholar
  7. F. H. Clarke: Generalized gradients and applications, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 205 (1975) 247–262.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1975-0367131-6Google Scholar
  8. P. Erdös: On the Hausdorff dimension of some sets in Euclidean space, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 52 (1946) 107–109.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1946-08514-6Google Scholar
  9. H. Federer: Geometric Measure Theory, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 153, Springer, New York (1969).Google Scholar
  10. S. Fitzpatrick: Representing monotone operators by convex functions, in: Workshop/Miniconference on Functional Analysis and Optimization, Canberra 1988), Proc. Centre Math. Anal. Australian Nat. Univ. vol. 20, Australian National University, Canberra (1988) 59–65.Google Scholar
  11. T. Fowler, D. Preiss: A simple proof of Zahorski’s description of non-differentiability sets of Lipschitz functions, Real Anal. Exchange 34 (2009) 127–138.https://doi.org/10.14321/realanalexch.34.1.0127Google Scholar
  12. F. R. Gantmacher: The Theory of Matrices. Vol. 1, translated from the Russian by K. A. Hirsch, reprint of the 1959 translation, AMS Chelsea Publishing, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1998).Google Scholar
  13. P. Hajłasz: On an old theorem of Erdös about ambiguous locus, Colloq. Math. 168 (2022) 249–256.https://doi.org/10.4064/cm8460-9-2021Google Scholar
  14. J.-B. Hiriart-Urruty, C. Lemaréchal: Fundamentals of Convex Analysis, Grundlehren Text Editions, Springer, Berlin (2001).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56468-0Google Scholar
  15. D. Kramkov, M. Sîrbu: Backward martingale transport and Fitzpatrick functions in pseudo-Euclidean spaces, Ann. Appl. Probab. 34/1B (2024) 1571–1599.https://doi.org/10.1214/23-AAP1998Google Scholar
  16. D. Kramkov, M. Sîrbu: Backward martingale transport maps in pseudo-Euclidean spaces, arXiv: 2304.08290 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1214/23-AAP1998Google Scholar
  17. D. Kramkov, Y. Xu: An optimal transport problem with backward martingale constraints motivated by insider trading, Ann. Appl. Probab. 32 (2022) 294–326.https://doi.org/10.1214/21-AAP1678Google Scholar
  18. J.-P. Penot: Positive sets, conservative sets and dissipative sets, J. Convex Analysis 16 (2009) 973–986.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca16059Google Scholar
  19. R. T. Rockafellar: Convex Analysis, Princeton Mathematical Series No. 28, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1970).Google Scholar
  20. R. T. Rockafellar, R. J.-B. Wets: Variational Analysis, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 317, Springer, Berlin (1998).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02431-3Google Scholar
  21. S. Simons: Positive sets and monotone sets, J. Convex Analysis 14 (2007) 297–317.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca14021Google Scholar
  22. L. Thibault: Unilateral Variational Analysis in Banach Spaces. Part II: Special Classes of Functions and Sets, World Scientific, Singapore (2023).https://doi.org/10.1142/12797Google Scholar
  23. Z. Zahorski: Sur la première dérivée, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 69 (1950) 1–54.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1950-0037338-9Google Scholar
  24. L. Zajíček: On the differentiation of convex functions in finite and infinite dimensional spaces, Czechoslovak Math. J. 29/104 (1979) 340–348.https://doi.org/10.21136/CMJ.1979.101616Google Scholar

D. Kramkov, M. Sîrbu. “Singularities of Fitzpatrick and Convex Functions.” Journal of Convex Analysis 31 (2024), No. 3, 827–846. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca31040