Given a continuous function f:Rd→Rf:\R^d\to \R with pp-growth, we extend the framework developed by J.-J. Alibert and G. Bouchitt{é} [Non-uniform integrability and generalized {Y}oung {M}easure, J. Con\-vex Analysis 4 (1997) 129–148] obtaining a new way of representing accumulation points of ∫Ωf(vi(z)) dμ(z),\begin{aligned}\int_\Omega f(v_i(z))\,d\mu(z),\end{aligned} where μ\mu is a finite positive Borel measure on an open bounded set Ω⊂Rn\Omega\subset \R^n, and (vi)i∈N⊂Lp(Ω,μ)(v_i)_{i\in \N}\subset L^p(\Omega,\mu) is norm bounded. We call such representations generalised Young Measures.
With the help of the new representation, we then characterise these limits when they are generated by gradients, that is, when vi=Duiv_i = Du_i for ui∈W1,1(Ω,Rm)u_i\in W^{1,1}(\Omega,\R^m), via a set of integral inequalities.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

  1. E. Acerbi, N. Fusco: Semicontinuity problems in the calculus of variations, Arch. Rational Mech. Analysis 86/2 (1984) 125–145.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00275731Google Scholar
  2. G. Alberti: Rank one property for derivatives of functions with bounded variation, Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A Math. 123/2 (1993) 239–274.https://doi.org/10.1017/S030821050002566XGoogle Scholar
  3. J.-J. Alibert, G. Bouchitté: Non-uniform integrability and generalized Young Measure, J. Convex Analysis 4 (1997) 129–148.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca04006Google Scholar
  4. L. Ambrosio, G. Dal Maso: On the relaxation in BV (Ω; Rm) of quasi-convex integrals, J. Funct. Analysis 109/1 (1992) 76–97.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1236(92)90012-8Google Scholar
  5. L. Ambrosio, N. Fusco, D. Pallara: Functions of Bounded Variation and Free Discontinuity Problems, Oxford Science Publications, Clarendon Press, Oxford (2000).https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198502456.001.0001Google Scholar
  6. A. Arroyo-Rabasa: Characterization of generalized Young Measures generated by A-free measures, Arch. Rational Mech. Analysis 242 (2021) 235–325.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-021-01683-yGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Baia, S. Kromer, M. Kruzik: Generalized W 1,1 -Young Measures and relaxation of problems with linear growth, SIAM J. Math. Analysis 50/1 (2018) 1076–1119.https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1103464Google Scholar
  8. E. J. Balder: Lectures on Young Measures, CEREMADE, Cahier 9517, Université de Paris-Dauphine, Paris (1995).Google Scholar
  9. E. J. Balder: New fundamentals of Young Measure convergence, in: Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control, A. Ioffe et al. (eds.), Res. Notes Math. 411, Chapman and Hall/CRC, London (2000) 24–48.Google Scholar
  10. J. M. Ball: Convexity conditions and existence theorems in nonlinear elasticity Arch. Rational Mech. Analysis 63 (1977) 337–403.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279992Google Scholar
  11. J. M. Ball: A version of the fundamental theorem for Young Measures, in: PDEs and Continuum Models of Phase Transitions, M. Rascle et al. (eds.), Nice 1988, Lect. Notes Phys. 344, Springer, Berlin (1989) 207–215.https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0024945Google Scholar
  12. J. M. Ball, J. C. Currie, P. J. Olver: Null lagrangians, weak continuity, and variational problems of arbitrary order, J. Funct. Analysis 41/2 (1981) 135–174.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1236(81)90085-9Google Scholar
  13. J. M. Ball, F. Murat: Remarks on Chacon’s biting lemma, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 107/3 (1989) 655–663.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1989-0984807-3Google Scholar
  14. J. M. Ball, K.-W. Zhang: Lower semicontinuity of multiple integrals and the biting lemma, Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A Math. 114/3-4 (1990) 367–379https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210500024483Google Scholar
  15. B. Benešová, S. Krömer, M. Kružík: Boundary effects and weak lower semicontinuity for signed integral functionals on BV, ESAIM Control, Optim. Calc. Var. 21/2 (2015) 513–534.https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2014036Google Scholar
  16. H. Berliocchi, J.-M. Lasry: Intégrandes normales et mesures paramétrées en calcul des variations, Bull. Soc. Math. France 101 (1973) 129–184.https://doi.org/10.24033/bsmf.1755Google Scholar
  17. V. I. Bogachev, M. A. S. Ruas: Measure Theory. Vol. 1, Springer, Berlin (2007).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34514-5_1Google Scholar
  18. C. Castaing, P. R. De Fitte, M. Valadier: Young Measures on Topological Spaces. With Applications in Control Theory and Probability Theory, Mathematics and its Applications Vol. 571, Kluwer, Dordrecht (2004).https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-1964-5Google Scholar
  19. R. E. Chandler: Hausdorff Compactifications, Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics Vol. 23, Marcel Dekker, New York (1976).Google Scholar
  20. B. Dacorogna: Direct Methods in the Calculus of Variations, Applied Mathematical Sciences Vol. 78, Springer, Berlin (2007).Google Scholar
  21. R. J. DiPerna, A. J. Majda: Oscillations and concentrations in weak solutions of the incompressible fluid equations, Comm. Math. Physics 108/4 (1987) 667–689.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01214424Google Scholar
  22. G. B. Folland: Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York (1999).Google Scholar
  23. I. Fonseca: Lower semicontinuity of surface energies, Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A Math. 120/1-2 (1992) 99–115.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210500015018Google Scholar
  24. I. Fonseca, M. Kružík: Oscillations and concentrations generated by A-free mappings and weak lower semicontinuity of integral functionals, ESAIM Control, Optim. Calc. Var. 16/2 (2010) 472–502.https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2009006Google Scholar
  25. I. Fonseca, G. Leoni: Modern Methods in the Calculus of Variations: Lp Spaces, Springer, Berlin (2007).Google Scholar
  26. I. Fonseca, S. Müller: Quasi-convex integrands and lower semicontinuity in L1, SIAM J. Math. Analysis 23/5 (1992) 1081–1098.https://doi.org/10.1137/0523060Google Scholar
  27. I. Fonseca, S. Müller: Relaxation of quasiconvex functionals in BV (O, Rp) for integrands F (x, u, ∇u), Arch. Rational Mech. Analysis 123/1 (1993) 1–49.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386367Google Scholar
  28. I. Fonseca, S. Müller: A-quasiconvexity, lower semicontinuity, and Young Measures, SIAM J. Math. Analysis 30/6 (1999) 1355–1390.https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036141098339885Google Scholar
  29. I. Fonseca, S. Müller, P. Pedregal: Analysis of concentration and oscillation effects generated by gradients, SIAM J. Math. Analysis 29/3 (1998) 736–756.https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036141096306534Google Scholar
  30. A. Kałamajska, M. Kružík: Oscillations and concentrations in sequences of gradients, ESAIM Control, Optim. Calc. Var. 14/1 (2008) 71–104.https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv:2007051Google Scholar
  31. D. Kinderlehrer, P. Pedregal: Characterizations of Young Measures generated by gradients, Arch. Rational Mech. Analysis 115/4 (1991) 329–365.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00375279Google Scholar
  32. D. Kinderlehrer, P. Pedregal: Gradient Young Measures generated by sequences in Sobolev spaces, J. Geom. Analysis 4/1 (1994) 59–90.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02921593Google Scholar
  33. B. Kirchheim, J. Kristensen: On rank-one convex functions that are homogeneous of degree one, Arch. Rational Mech. Analysis 221/1 (2016) 527–558.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-016-0967-1Google Scholar
  34. J. Kristensen, B. Raiță: Oscillation and concentration in sequences of PDE constrained measures, Arch. Rational Mech. Analysis 246/2-3 (2022) 823–875.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-022-01828-7Google Scholar
  35. J. Kristensen, F. Rindler: Characterization of generalized Gradient Young Measures generated by sequences in W 1,1 and BV, Arch. Rational Mech. Analysis 197/2 (2010) 539–598.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-009-0287-9Google Scholar
  36. J. Kristensen, F. Rindler: Relaxation of signed integral functionals in BV, Calc. Var. Partial Diff. Equations 37/1-2 (2010) 29–62.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-009-0250-5Google Scholar
  37. S. Krömer: On compactness of minimizing sequences subject to a linear differential constraint, Z. Analysis Anwend. 30/3 (2011) 269–303.https://doi.org/10.4171/zaa/1435Google Scholar
  38. S. Krömer, M. Kružík: Oscillations and concentrations up to the boundary, J. Convex Analysis 20/3 (2013) 723–752.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca20041Google Scholar
  39. M. Kružík: Quasiconvexity at the boundary and concentration effects generated by gradients*, ESAIM Control, Optim. Calc. Var. 19/3 (2013) 679–700.https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2012028Google Scholar
  40. M. Kružík, T. Roubíček: Explicit characterization of Lp -Young Measures, J. Math. Analysis Appl. 198/3 (1996) 830–843.https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1996.0115Google Scholar
  41. P. D. Lax: Functional Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York (2002).Google Scholar
  42. P. Marcellini: Approximation of quasiconvex functions, and lower semicontinuity of multiple integrals Manuscripta Math .51/1-3 (1985) 1–28.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01168345Google Scholar
  43. P. Marcellini, C. Sbordone: Semicontinuity problems in the calculus of variations, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Meth. Appl. 4/2 (1980) 241–257.https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-546X(80)90052-8Google Scholar
  44. E. J. McShane: Generalized curves, Duke Math. J. 6/1 (1940) 513–536.https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-40-00642-1Google Scholar
  45. E. J. McShane: Relaxed controls and variational problems, SIAM J. Control 5/3 (1967) 438–485.https://doi.org/10.1137/0305027Google Scholar
  46. N. G. Meyers: Quasi-convexity and lower semi-continuity of multiple variational integrals of any order, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 119/1 (1965) 125–149.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1965-0188838-3Google Scholar
  47. C. B. Morrey: Quasi-convexity and the lower semicontinuity of multiple integrals, Pacific J. Math. 2/1 (1952) 25–53.https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1952.2.25Google Scholar
  48. S. Müller: On quasiconvex functions which are homogeneous of degree 1, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 41/1 (1992) 295–301.https://doi.org/10.1512/iumj.1992.41.41017Google Scholar
  49. F. Murat: Compacité par compensation: condition nécessaire et suffisante de continuité faible sous une hypothèse de rang constant, Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Clas. Scienze 8/1 (1981) 69–102.Google Scholar
  50. P. Pedregal: Parametrized Measures and Variational Principles, Springer, Berlin (1997).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8886-8Google Scholar
  51. Y. G. Reshetnyak: Weak convergence of completely additive vector functions on a set, Siberian Math. J. 9/6 (1968) 1039–1045.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02196453Google Scholar
  52. F. Rindler: Lower semicontinuity and Young Measures in BV without Alberti’s rank-one theorem, Adv. Calc. Var. 5/2 (2012) 127–159.https://doi.org/10.1515/acv.2011.008Google Scholar
  53. F. Rindler: Calculus of Variations, Universitext Vol. 5, Springer, Cham (2018).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77637-8Google Scholar
  54. T. Roubiček: Relaxation in Optimization Theory and Variational Calculus, De Gruyter, Berlin (1997).https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110811919Google Scholar
  55. T. Schmidt: Strict interior approximation of sets of finite perimeter and functions of bounded variation, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 143/5 (2015) 2069–2084.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-2014-12381-1Google Scholar
  56. L. Tartar: Compensated compactness and applications to partial differential equations, in: Nonlinear Analysis and Mechanics: Heriot-Watt Symposium Vol. 4, Research Notes in Mathematics 39, Edinburgh (1979) 136–212.Google Scholar
  57. L. C. Young: Generalized curves and the existence of an attained absolute minimum in the calculus of variations, C. R. Soc. Sci. Lett. Varsovie 30 (1937) 212–234.Google Scholar

T. Seneci. “Generalised Young Measures and Characterisation of Gradient Young Measures.” Journal of Convex Analysis 31 (2024), No. 3, 889–946. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca31044