Using a convenient subbase on the second hyperspace of a compactum with the Vietoris topology, we prove that the mapping that takes each closed non-empty subset AA of an II-convex compactum XX to its closed idempotent convex hull is continuous. This implies that each neighborhood of the diagonal ΔX⊂X×X\Delta_X\subset X\times X contains an idempotent convex neighborhood. The main result is the theorem that the topology on an idempotent convex compactum XX is determined by a family of idempotent convex pseudometrics (with one idempotent convex metric if XX is metrizable).

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

Oleh Nykyforchyn

Institute of Mathematics, Casimir the Great University, Bydgoszcz, Poland
and: Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science, V. Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

oleh.nyk@gmail.com

Mariia Savchyn

Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science, V. Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

savchyn.mar@gmail.com
  1. M. Akian: Densities of idempotent measures and large deviations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 351/11 (1999) 4515–4543.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-99-02153-4Google Scholar
  2. M. Bazylevych, D. Repovš, M. Zarichnyi: Hyperspaces of max-plus convex subsets of powers of the real line, J. Math. Analysis Appl. 394/2 (2012) 481–487.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.05.002Google Scholar
  3. W. Briec: Some remarks on an idempotent and non-associative convex structure, J. Convex Analysis 22/1 (2015) 259–289.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca22013Google Scholar
  4. W. Briec, C. D. Horvath: B-convexity, Optimization 53 (2004) 103–127.https://doi.org/10.1080/02331930410001695283Google Scholar
  5. R. Engelking: General Topology, Berlin, Heldermann (1989).Google Scholar
  6. G. Gierz, K. H. Hofmann, K.Keimel, J. D. Lawson, M. Mislove, D. S. Scott: Continuous Lattices and Domains, in: Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 93, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542725Google Scholar
  7. I. D. Hlushak, O. R. Nykyforchyn: Continuity of idempotent convex combination of infinite number of elements in an I-convex compactum (Ukrainian), Precarpathian Bull. Shevchenko Sci. Soc. 1/33 (2016) 152–156.Google Scholar
  8. C. Horvath: Max-plus convexity in Riesz spaces, Top. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 59/2A (2022) 423–465.Google Scholar
  9. S. Kakutani: Über die Metrisation der topologischen Gruppen, Proc. Imp. Acad. Tokyo 12 (1936) 82–84.https://doi.org/10.3792/pia/1195580206Google Scholar
  10. E. P. Klement, R. Mesiar, E. Pap: Triangular Norms, Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9540-7Google Scholar
  11. V. N. Kolokoltsov, V. P. Maslov: Idempotent Analysis and its Applications, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8901-7Google Scholar
  12. G. L. Litvinov, V. P. Maslov, G. B. Shpiz: Idempotent functional analysis: an algebraic approach, Math. Notes 69 (2001) 696–729.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010266012029Google Scholar
  13. V. Nitica, S. Sergeev: Tropical convexity over max-min semiring, in: Tropical and Idempotent Mathematics and Applications, G. L. Litvinov, S. N. Sergeev (eds.), Contemporary Mathematics vol. 616, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2014) 241–260.https://doi.org/10.1090/conm/616/12301Google Scholar
  14. O. Nykyforchyn, D. Repovš: Idempotent convexity and algebras for the capacity monad and its submonads, Appl. Categorical Structures 19/4 (20011) 709–727.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10485-010-9229-9Google Scholar
  15. O. Nykyforchyn, D. Repovš: L-convexity and lattice-valued capacities, J. Convex Analysis 21 (2014) 29–52.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca21002Google Scholar
  16. D. Speyer, B. Sturmfels: Tropical mathematics, Math. Magazine 82/3 (2009) 163–173.https://doi.org/10.1080/0025570X.2009.11953615Google Scholar

O. Nykyforchyn, M. Savchyn. “Metrization of Idempotent Convex Compacta.” Journal of Convex Analysis 29 (2022), No. 3, 717–730. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca29040