We present a uniqueness result of uniformly continuous solutions for a general minimization problem in the Calculus of Variations. We minimize the functional Iλ(u):=∫Ωφ(∇u)+λu\mathcal{I}_\lambda(u):=\int_\Omega \varphi(\nabla u) +\lambda u with φ\varphi a convex but not necessarily strictly convex function, Ω\Omega an open set of RN\mathbb{R}^N with N∈NN\in \mathbb{N} and λ∈R\lambda\in\mathbb{R}. The proof is based on the two following main points: the functional Iλ\mathcal{I}_\lambda is invariant under translations and we assume that the function φ\varphi is not affine on any non-empty open set. This provides a shorter proof and/or an extension for some already known uniqueness results for functionals of the type Iλ\mathcal{I}_\lambda that are presented in the article.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

  1. G. Bouchitté, P. Bousquet: On a degenerate problem in the calculus of variations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 371/2 (2019) 777–807.https://doi.org/10.1090/tran/7570Google Scholar
  2. P. Bousquet: Boundary continuity of solutions to a basic problem in the calculus of variations, Adv. Calc. Var. 3/1 (2010) 1–27.https://doi.org/10.1515/acv.2010.001Google Scholar
  3. A. Cellina: Comparison results and estimates on the gradient without strict convexity, SIAM J. Control Optimization 46 (2007) 738–749.https://doi.org/10.1137/060655869Google Scholar
  4. B. Dacorogna: Direct Methods in the Calculus of Variations, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin (2008).https://doi.org/10.1142/p616Google Scholar
  5. D. De Silva, O. Savin: Minimizers of convex functionals arising in random surfaces, Duke Math. J. 151 (2010) 487–532.https://doi.org/10.1215/00127094-2010-004Google Scholar
  6. L. Evans, R. Gariepy: Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions, CRC Press, Boca Raton (1992).Google Scholar
  7. E. Giusti: Direct Methods in the Calculus of Variations, World Scientific, River Edge (2003).https://doi.org/10.1142/5002Google Scholar
  8. B. Kawohl, J. Stara, G. Wittum: Analysis and numerical studies of a problem of shape design, Arch. Rat. Mech. Analysis 114 (1991) 349–363.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376139Google Scholar
  9. L. Lussardi, E. Mascolo: A uniqueness result for a class of non-strictly convex variational problems, J. Math. Analysis Appl. 446 (2017) 1687–1694.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.09.060Google Scholar
  10. P. Marcellini: A relation between existence of minima for nonconvex integrals and uniqueness for non strictly convex integrals of the calculus of variations, in: Mathematical Theories of Optimization, Proceedings, J. P. Cecconi et al. (eds.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics 979, Springer, Berlin (1983) 216–231.https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0066256Google Scholar
  11. P. Sternberg, G. Williams, W. P. Ziemer: Existence, uniqueness, and regularity for functions of least gradient, J. Reine Angew. Math. (Crelles Journal) 1992 (1992) 35–60.https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1992.430.35Google Scholar
  12. P. Sternberg, G. Williams, W. P. Ziemer: The constrained least gradient problem in Rn, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 339/1 (1993) 403–432.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1993-1126213-2Google Scholar

B. Lledos. “A Uniqueness Result for a Translation Invariant Problem in the Calculus of Variations.” Journal of Convex Analysis 31 (2024), No. 1, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca31008