We study the behavior of the second eigenfunction of the anisotropic pp-Laplace operator −Qpu:=−div(Fp−1(∇u)Fξ(∇u)),-\mathcal Q_{p}u:=-{\rm div} \left(F^{p-1}(\nabla u)F_\xi (\nabla u)\right), as p→1+p \to 1^+, where FF is a suitable smooth norm of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}. Moreover, for any regular set Ω\Omega, we define the second anisotropic Cheeger constant as h2,F(Ω):=inf⁡{max⁡{PF(E1)∣E1∣,PF(E2)∣E2∣},  E1,E2⊂Ω,E1∩E2=∅},h_{2,F}(\Omega):=\inf \left\{ \max\left\{\frac{P_{F}(E_{1})}{|E_{1}|},\frac{P_{F}(E_{2})}{|E_{2}|}\right\},\; E_{1},E_{2}\subset \Omega, E_{1}\cap E_{2}=\emptyset\right\}, where PF(E)P_{F}(E) is the anisotropic perimeter of EE, and study the connection with the second eigenvalue of the anisotropic pp-Laplacian. Finally, we study the twisted anisotropic qq-Cheeger constant with a volume constraint.

Contact details are reproduced from the original publication and may be historical.

  1. A. Alvino, V. Ferone, P.-L. Lions, G. Trombetti: Convex symmetrization and applications, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 14/2 (1997) 275–293.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0294-1449(97)80147-3Google Scholar
  2. A. Alvino, V. Ferone, G. Trombetti: On the properties of some nonlinear eigenvalues, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 29/2 (1998) 437–451.https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036141096302111Google Scholar
  3. M. Amar, G. Bellettini: A notion of total variation depending on a metric with discontinuous coefficients, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 11/1 (1994) 91–133.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0294-1449(16)30197-4Google Scholar
  4. L. Ambrosio, A. Colesanti, E. Villa: Outer Minkowski content for some classes of closed sets, Math. Ann. 342/4 (2008) 727–748.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-008-0254-zGoogle Scholar
  5. L. Ambrosio, M. Novaga, E. Paolini: Some regularity results for minimal crystals. A tribute to J. L. Lions, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 8 (2002) 69–103.https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv:2002018Google Scholar
  6. R. Barbato, F. Della Pietra, G. Piscitelli: On the first Robin eigenvalue of the Finsler p-Laplace operator as p → 1, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 540 (2024), art.no. 128660, 25p.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2024.128660Google Scholar
  7. L. Barbosa, P. Bérard: Eigenvalue and “twisted” eigenvalue problems, applications to CMC surfaces, J. Math. Pures Appl. 79/5 (2000) 427–450.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-7824(00)00160-4Google Scholar
  8. G. Bellettini, G. Bouchitté, I. Fragalá: BV functions with respect to a measure and relaxation of metric integral functionals, J. Convex Analysis 6/2 (1999) 349–366.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca06020Google Scholar
  9. G. Bellettini, M. Novaga, G. Riey: First variation of anisotropic energies and crystalline mean curvature of partitions, Interfaces Free Bound 5/3 (2003) 331–356.https://doi.org/10.4171/ifb/82Google Scholar
  10. G. Bellettini, M. Paolini: Anisotropic motion by mean curvature in the context of Finsler geometry, Hokkaido Math. J. 25 (1996) 537–566.https://doi.org/10.14492/hokmj/1351516749Google Scholar
  11. M. Belloni, V. Ferone, B. Kawohl: Isoperimetric inequalities, Wulff shape and related questions for strongly nonlinear elliptic operators, Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 54/5 (2003) 771–783.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-003-3209-yGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Belloni, B. Kawohl, P. Juutinen: The p-Laplace eigenvalue problem as p → ∞ in a Finsler metric, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 8/1 (2006) 123–138.https://doi.org/10.4171/jems/40Google Scholar
  13. V. Bobkov, E. Parini: On the higher Cheeger problem, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 97/3 (2018) 575–600.https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms.12119Google Scholar
  14. B. Brandolini, F. Della Pietra, C. Nitsch, C. Trombetti: Symmetry breaking in a constrained Cheeger type isoperimetric inequality, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 21/2 (2015) 359–371.https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2014016Google Scholar
  15. H. Busemann: Intrinsic area, Ann. of Math. (2) 48 (1947) 234–267.https://doi.org/10.2307/1969168Google Scholar
  16. V. Caselles, A. Chambolle, S. Moll, M. Novaga: A characterization of convex calibrable sets in Rn with respect to anisotropic norms, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 25/4 (2008) 803–832.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anihpc.2008.04.003Google Scholar
  17. V. Caselles, G. Facciolo, E. Meinhardt: Anisotropic Cheeger sets and applications, SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 2/4 (2009) 1211–1254.https://doi.org/10.1137/08073696XGoogle Scholar
  18. K. C. Chang, S. Shao, D. Zhang: Nodal domains of eigenvectors for 1-Laplacian on graphs, Adv. Math. 308 (2017) 529–574.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2016.12.020Google Scholar
  19. M. Cicalese, C. Trombetti: Asymptotic behaviour of solutions to p‐Laplacian equation, Asymptot. Analysis 35/1 (2003) 27–40.https://doi.org/10.3233/ASY-2003-564Google Scholar
  20. A. Corbo Esposito, G. Piscitelli: Pseudo-orthogonality for graph 1-Laplacian eigenvectors and applications to higher Cheeger constants and data clustering, Front. Math. China 17/4 (2022) 591–623.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11464-021-0961-2Google Scholar
  21. F. Della Pietra, G. di Blasio, N. Gavitone: Sharp estimates on the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of nonlinear elliptic operators via maximum principle, Adv. Nonlinear Analysis 9/1 (2020) 278–291.https://doi.org/10.1515/anona-2017-0281Google Scholar
  22. F. Della Pietra, N. Gavitone: Relative isoperimetric inequality in the plane: the anisotropic case, J. Convex Analysis 20/1 (2013) 157–180.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca20010Google Scholar
  23. F. Della Pietra, N. Gavitone: Faber-Krahn inequality for anisotropic eigenvalue problems with Robin boundary conditions, Potential Analysis 41/4 (2014) 1147–1166.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11118-014-9412-yGoogle Scholar
  24. F. Della Pietra, N. Gavitone: Sharp bounds for the first eigenvalue and the torsional rigidity related to some anisotropic operators, Math. Nachrichten 287/2-3 (2014) 194–209.https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.201200296Google Scholar
  25. F. Della Pietra, N. Gavitone, G. Piscitelli: A sharp weighted anisotropic Poincaré inequality for convex domains, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 355/7 (2017) 748–752.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2017.06.005Google Scholar
  26. F. Della Pietra, N. Gavitone, G. Piscitelli: On the second Dirichlet eigenvalue of some nonlinear anisotropic elliptic operators, Bull. Sci. Math. 155 (2019) 10–32.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulsci.2019.02.005Google Scholar
  27. F. Della Pietra, C. Nitsch, F. Oliva, C. Trombetti: On the behavior of the first eigenvalue of the p-Laplacian with Robin boundary conditions as p goes to 1, Adv. Calc. Var. 16/4 (2023) 1123–1135.https://doi.org/10.1515/acv-2021-0085Google Scholar
  28. F. Della Pietra, F. Oliva, S. Segura de León: Behaviour of solutions to p-Laplacian with Robin boundary conditions as p goes to 1, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 154/1 (2024) 105–130.https://doi.org/10.1017/prm.2022.92Google Scholar
  29. L. Esposito, B. Kawohl, C. Nitsch, C. Trombetti: The Neumann eigenvalue problem for the ∞-Laplacian, Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl. 26 (2015) 119–134.https://doi.org/10.4171/rlm/697Google Scholar
  30. L. Esposito, C. Trombetti: Convex symmetrization and Pólya–Szegö inequality, Nonlinear Analysis 56/1 (2004) 43–62.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2003.07.010Google Scholar
  31. H. Federer: Geometric Measure Theory, Springer, New York (1969).Google Scholar
  32. A. Ferone, R. Volpicelli: Convex symmetrization: the equality case in Pólya-Szegö inequality, Calc. Var. Partial Diff. Equations 21 (2004) 259–272.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-003-0256-3Google Scholar
  33. V. Franceschi, A. Pinamonti, G. Saracco, G. Stefani: The Cheeger problem in abstract measure spaces, J. London Math. Soc., 2nd Ser. 109/1 (2024), art.no. e12840, 55p.https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms.12840Google Scholar
  34. P. Freitas, A. Henrot: On the first twisted Dirichlet eigenvalue, Comm. Anal. Geom. 12/5 (2004) 1083–1103.https://doi.org/10.4310/CAG.2004.v12.n5.a5Google Scholar
  35. P. Juutinen, P. Lindqvist, J. J. Manfredi: The ∞-eigenvalue problem, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 148/2 (1999) 89–105.https://doi.org/10.1007/s002050050157Google Scholar
  36. B. Kawohl, V. Fridman: Isoperimetric estimates for the first eigenvalue of the p-Laplace operator and the Cheeger constant, Comm. Math. Univ. Carolin. 44/4 (2003) 659–667.Google Scholar
  37. B. Kawohl, M. Novaga: The p-Laplace eigenvalue problem as p → 1 and Cheeger sets in a Finsler metric, J. Convex Analysis 15/3 (2008) 623–634.https://doi.org/10.68381/jca15043Google Scholar
  38. B. Kawohl, F. Schuricht: Dirichlet problems for the 1-Laplace operator, including the eigenvalue problem, Comm. Contemp. Math. 9/4 (2007) 515–543.https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219199707002514Google Scholar
  39. O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, N. N. Ural’tseva: Linear and Quasilinear Elliptic Equations, Academic Press, New York (1968).Google Scholar
  40. L. Lefton, D. Wei: Numerical approximation of the first eigenpair of the p-Laplacian using finite elements and the penalty method, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 18/3-4 (1997) 389–399.https://doi.org/10.1080/01630569708816767Google Scholar
  41. G. P. Leonardi: An overview on the Cheeger problem. New trends in shape optimization, in: New trends in shape optimization, A. Pratelli et al. (eds.), Int. Ser. Numer. Math. 166, Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham (2015) 117–139.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17563-8_6Google Scholar
  42. S. Littig, F. Schuricht: Convergence of the eigenvalues of the p-Laplace operator as p goes to 1, Calc. Var. Partial Diff. Equations 49/1-2 (2014) 707–727.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-013-0597-5Google Scholar
  43. F. Maggi: Sets of Finite Perimeter and Geometric Variational Problems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139108133Google Scholar
  44. A. Mercaldo, J. D. Rossi, S. Segura De Leon, C. Trombetti: Behaviour of p-Laplacian problems with Neumann boundary conditions when p goes to 1, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 12/1 (2013) 253–267.https://doi.org/10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.253Google Scholar
  45. E. Parini: The second eigenvalue of the p-Laplacian as p goes to 1, Int. J. Differ. Equations 2010 (2010), art.no. 984671, 23p.https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/984671Google Scholar
  46. E. Parini: An introduction to the Cheeger problem, Surveys Math. Appl. 6 (2011) 9–21.Google Scholar
  47. G. Piscitelli: A nonlocal anisotropic eigenvalue problem, Diff. Int. Equations 29 (2016) 11–12, 1001–1020.https://doi.org/10.57262/die/1476369326Google Scholar
  48. G. Piscitelli: The anisotropic ∞-Laplacian eigenvalue problem with Neumann boundary conditions, Diff. Int. Equations 32 (2019) 11–12, 705–734.https://doi.org/10.57262/die/1571731516Google Scholar
  49. P. H. Rabinowitz: Minimax Methods in Critical Point Theory with Applications to Differential Equations, CBMS Reg. Conf. Ser. Math. 65, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1986).https://doi.org/10.1090/cbms/065Google Scholar
  50. G. Saracco, G. Stefani: On the N-Cheeger problem for component-wise increasing norms, J. Math Pures Appl. 189 (2024), art.no. 103593, 35p.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpur.2024.06.008Google Scholar
  51. T. Schmidt: Strict interior approximation of sets of finite perimeter and functions of bounded variation, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 143/5 (2015) 2069–2084.https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-2014-12381-1Google Scholar

G. Piscitelli. “On the Second Anisotropic Cheeger Constant and Related Questions.” Journal of Convex Analysis 33 (2026), No. 1&2, 303–324. https://doi.org/10.68381/jca33019